Evidence-based medicine helps separate IV therapy facts from marketing claims. Source: Wikimedia Commons
Why IV Therapy Myths Persist
The global wellness industry is projected to reach $7 trillion by 2025[1], with IV therapy representing one of its fastest-growing segments. As demand increases, so does marketing hyperbole. The result: a landscape where medical fact and marketing fiction become difficult to distinguish.
Several factors contribute to the persistence of IV therapy myths:
- Survivorship bias: Satisfied customers share glowing testimonials on social media, while those with no benefit or negative experiences remain silent[2]
- Placebo effect: Up to 30-40% of therapeutic response to treatments can be attributed to placebo[3]
- Correlation versus causation: Feeling better after IV therapy doesn't prove the IV caused the improvement (you might have recovered naturally)
- Marketing incentives: Providers have financial motivation to make bold claims that attract customers
- Celebrity influence: High-profile endorsements create perception of legitimacy without scientific evidence
- Complexity of science: Nuanced medical research gets oversimplified into catchy slogans
This article examines common IV therapy myths through the lens of peer-reviewed scientific research, medical consensus, and transparent evaluation of evidence. Our goal is not to dismiss IV therapy wholesale, but to separate legitimate medical applications from unsubstantiated wellness claims.
Evidence-based medicine requires rigorous peer-reviewed research, not anecdotes or marketing claims. Source: Wikimedia Commons
Myth: IV Therapy Is Always Better Than Oral Vitamins
The Claim:
"IV therapy delivers 100% bioavailability while oral supplements are only 20-50% absorbed, making IV therapy superior for all vitamin supplementation."
The Truth:
The bioavailability claim is accurate, but the conclusion is flawed. Yes, IV administration bypasses the digestive system, providing 100% bioavailability compared to variable absorption of oral supplements (typically 20-50% depending on the nutrient)[4]. However, this doesn't mean IV therapy is always better or necessary.
What Research Actually Shows:
A landmark study by Padayatty et al. (2004) published in Annals of Internal Medicine examined vitamin C pharmacokinetics and found that while IV administration achieves higher peak blood concentrations, oral supplementation produces adequate therapeutic levels for most health purposes in individuals with normal gastrointestinal function[5].
The National Institutes of Health concludes that for routine supplementation in healthy individuals, oral vitamins are "safe, effective, and considerably less expensive" than IV administration[6].
When IV IS Better:
- Severe dehydration: When oral rehydration is impossible due to vomiting or diarrhea[7]
- Malabsorption disorders: Celiac disease, Crohn's disease, or post-bariatric surgery patients who cannot absorb oral nutrients[8]
- Severe documented deficiency: When rapid correction is medically necessary (e.g., severe B12 deficiency with neurological symptoms)[9]
- Clinical settings: Hospital patients unable to take oral medication
When Oral Is Sufficient:
- Daily maintenance supplementation for general wellness
- Prevention of deficiency in healthy individuals
- Long-term supplementation strategies
- Budget-conscious health optimization
The Bottom Line:
IV therapy offers superior bioavailability, but this doesn't translate to superior outcomes for routine supplementation in healthy individuals. Think of it like transportation: a helicopter is faster than a car, but you don't need a helicopter for your daily commute. IV therapy is a powerful tool for specific situations, not a universal replacement for oral vitamins.
Myth: IV Therapy Can Detox Your Body
The Claim:
"Detox IV drips flush toxins from your body, cleanse your liver, and purify your bloodstream. Get rid of environmental toxins, heavy metals, and harmful chemicals with our detox infusion."
The Truth:
This is perhaps the most misleading claim in the IV therapy industry. Your liver and kidneys already perform continuous, highly effective detoxification 24 hours a day[10]. No IV therapy can enhance this process or remove unspecified "toxins" from your body.
What Science Says:
A comprehensive review by Klein and Kiat (2015) in Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics examined detoxification claims across various therapies and concluded: "At present, there is no compelling evidence to support the use of detox diets or IV therapies for detoxification or elimination of toxins from the body."[11]
The British Dietetic Association states unequivocally: "The whole idea of detox is nonsense. Your body is a well-developed system that has its own built-in mechanisms to detoxify and remove waste and toxins."[12]
How Your Body Actually Detoxifies:
- Liver: Processes and neutralizes drugs, alcohol, and metabolic waste through Phase I and Phase II detoxification enzymes[13]
- Kidneys: Filter blood and excrete waste products through urine
- Lungs: Eliminate carbon dioxide and volatile organic compounds
- Skin: Minor excretion through sweat
- Gastrointestinal tract: Eliminates waste through feces
What About Glutathione?
Many "detox" IV drips contain glutathione, a powerful antioxidant that supports liver function[14]. While glutathione does play a role in cellular detoxification pathways, this doesn't mean IV glutathione "detoxes" your body:
- Your body produces glutathione naturally
- Healthy individuals maintain adequate glutathione levels without supplementation
- Evidence for IV glutathione benefits is limited to specific medical conditions (e.g., Parkinson's disease research)[15]
- Glutathione supports existing detoxification systems; it doesn't remove mysterious "toxins"
The Bottom Line:
The concept of "detox IV therapy" is marketing fiction. Your liver and kidneys are already expert detoxifiers. If you have genuine concern about toxin exposure (e.g., heavy metal poisoning), you need medical chelation therapy supervised by a toxicologist, not a wellness IV drip. IV hydration can support normal kidney function, and certain nutrients may support liver health, but this is not the same as removing "toxins."
Myth: IV Therapy Is an Instant Hangover Cure
The Claim:
"Get instantly cured from even the worst hangover! Our IV drip eliminates hangover symptoms in minutes, so you can get back to your vacation immediately."
The Truth:
This claim contains both truth and exaggeration. IV therapy can significantly accelerate hangover recovery, but "instant cure" is misleading. The reality is more nuanced and more interesting.
What Causes Hangovers:
Hangovers result from multiple physiological processes[16]:
- Dehydration: Alcohol is a diuretic, causing fluid and electrolyte loss
- Acetaldehyde toxicity: Alcohol metabolism produces toxic acetaldehyde
- Inflammation: Alcohol triggers inflammatory cytokine release
- Glutamine rebound: Disrupted sleep quality
- Gastrointestinal disturbance: Stomach lining irritation
- Hypoglycemia: Low blood sugar from impaired glucose metabolism
What IV Therapy Actually Does:
Hangover IV therapy typically contains[17]:
- IV fluids (saline): Rapidly rehydrates (1 liter in 20-25 minutes versus several hours orally)
- Electrolytes: Replaces sodium, potassium, and magnesium lost through diuresis
- B-vitamins: Replenishes vitamins depleted by alcohol metabolism
- Anti-nausea medication: Ondansetron or similar to control vomiting
- Anti-inflammatory medication: NSAIDs for headache relief
What Research Shows:
While there are no large randomized controlled trials specifically on "hangover IV therapy" (likely because it's difficult to get ethics approval and funding for research on voluntary alcohol overconsumption), we can examine the evidence for individual components:
- IV rehydration: Well-established as superior to oral rehydration when patients are dehydrated and nauseated[18]
- Anti-emetics: Ondansetron effectively reduces nausea and vomiting[19]
- B-vitamins: Alcohol depletes B-vitamins; replacement is medically sound[20]
Realistic Timeline:
Based on clinical experience and patient reports:
- 0-15 minutes: Nausea relief as anti-emetic takes effect
- 15-30 minutes: Headache improvement as hydration and medication work
- 20 minutes: Significant symptom improvement (50-70% reduction)
- 2-4 hours: Most patients report near-complete recovery
The Bottom Line:
IV therapy is not an "instant" hangover cure, but it does provide faster and more complete relief than drinking water and resting. The mechanism is sound: you're receiving medical-grade rehydration and symptom management. It's not magic; it's supportive medical care that addresses the physiological causes of hangover symptoms. The best "cure" remains preventing hangovers by drinking moderately or not at all.
Questions About IV Therapy Claims?
Our licensed medical team provides honest, evidence-based information about IV therapy benefits and limitations.
Myth: More Vitamins Are Always Better
The Claim:
"Our megadose IV contains 50,000mg of vitamin C and 10,000% of your daily B12 requirement. More vitamins mean better results and faster recovery!"
The Truth:
This is dangerously false. The principle "more is better" does not apply to vitamins. Excessive vitamin intake can be wasteful at best and harmful at worst.
Water-Soluble Vitamins (B, C):
These are excreted in urine when they exceed your body's needs. Taking megadoses doesn't provide extra benefit; you literally urinate out the excess[21]. This creates what physicians call "expensive urine."
More concerning, even water-soluble vitamins can cause harm in excessive amounts:
- Vitamin C: Doses above 2,000mg daily increase risk of kidney stones in susceptible individuals[22]
- Vitamin B6: Chronic intake above 200mg daily can cause peripheral neuropathy (nerve damage)[23]
- Niacin (B3): High doses can cause liver damage and skin flushing[24]
Fat-Soluble Vitamins (A, D, E, K):
These accumulate in body fat and can reach toxic levels with excessive supplementation[25]:
- Vitamin A: Toxicity causes liver damage, bone loss, and birth defects during pregnancy
- Vitamin D: Excess causes hypercalcemia (too much calcium in blood), leading to kidney damage
- Vitamin E: High doses increase bleeding risk and may increase mortality[26]
What "Therapeutic Dose" Actually Means:
Evidence-based medical practice uses therapeutic doses based on clinical research, not arbitrary megadoses[27]:
- Vitamin C for immune support: 1,000-2,000mg (not 25,000-50,000mg)
- B12 for deficiency correction: 1,000-5,000mcg (not 50,000mcg)
- Magnesium for muscle function: 400-600mg (not 2,000mg)
The Bottom Line:
Vitamin dosing should be based on individual needs, medical evidence, and safety profiles. Megadose marketing is designed to impress customers with big numbers, not deliver better outcomes. Reputable providers use evidence-based therapeutic doses, not maximum amounts designed for marketing impact.
Myth: IV Therapy Is Completely Risk-Free
The Claim:
"IV therapy is 100% safe with zero side effects. It's just vitamins and water - nothing can go wrong!"
The Truth:
No medical procedure is completely risk-free, including IV therapy. While generally very safe when administered by qualified professionals following proper protocols, potential risks exist and patients deserve honest information[28].
Common Minor Risks (5-10% of patients):
- Bruising: Minor hematoma at insertion site
- Discomfort: Brief pain during needle insertion
- Cool sensation: Feeling cold as room-temperature fluid enters bloodstream
- Taste changes: Some vitamins (B-complex) cause temporary metallic taste
Less Common Complications (1-5%):
- Phlebitis: Vein inflammation causing redness and tenderness[29]
- Infiltration: IV fluid leaking into tissue, causing swelling[30]
- Mild allergic reaction: Localized itching or rash
Rare Serious Complications (less than 0.1%):
- Infection: When sterile protocols not properly followed[31]
- Anaphylaxis: Severe allergic reaction (requires epinephrine)[32]
- Fluid overload: Particularly in patients with heart or kidney conditions[33]
- Air embolism: Extremely rare with modern equipment and technique[34]
How to Minimize Risks:
- Choose licensed, qualified healthcare providers
- Verify sterile technique is followed
- Disclose complete medical history and allergies
- Ensure emergency medications (epinephrine) are available
- Report any discomfort or unusual symptoms immediately
The Bottom Line:
IV therapy is very safe when properly administered, but not risk-free. Honest providers acknowledge risks and implement protocols to minimize them. Be wary of anyone claiming their medical procedure has "zero risk" or "no side effects."
Myth: Celebrity Endorsements Prove Efficacy
The Claim:
"Celebrities and influencers swear by our IV drips! If it works for them, it will work for you. See what your favorite stars are doing to stay beautiful and energized."
The Truth:
Celebrity endorsements are marketing strategies, not medical evidence. The fact that a famous person uses IV therapy tells you nothing about its scientific validity or appropriateness for your health needs.
Why Celebrity Endorsements Are Misleading:
- Financial incentives: Many celebrity posts are paid partnerships or sponsorships not disclosed as advertisements[35]
- Survivorship bias: You see successful celebrities who happen to use IV therapy, not unsuccessful people who also use it
- Confounding variables: Celebrity health and appearance result from personal trainers, nutritionists, cosmetic procedures, genetics, professional styling, and photo editing, not IV drips
- Placebo effect: Believing something works makes it more likely to feel like it works
- No medical expertise: Being famous doesn't qualify someone to evaluate medical treatments
What Actually Constitutes Evidence:
Medical evidence comes from rigorous scientific research[36]:
- Randomized controlled trials: Gold standard comparing treatment to placebo or alternative
- Systematic reviews: Analysis of multiple studies to identify consistent patterns
- Peer-reviewed publications: Research evaluated by independent experts before publication
- Replication: Multiple independent researchers reaching similar conclusions
- Clinical guidelines: Professional medical organizations' consensus recommendations
The Bottom Line:
Make health decisions based on scientific evidence and consultation with qualified medical professionals, not celebrity social media posts. Ask: "What does the research show?" not "What does this famous person say?"
Myth: All IV Therapy Providers Are the Same
The Claim:
"IV therapy is IV therapy. Everyone uses the same vitamins and saline, so just choose the cheapest option."
The Truth:
Provider quality varies dramatically, with significant differences in medical qualifications, safety protocols, ingredient sourcing, and patient assessment. Choosing a provider is as important as choosing the treatment.
Critical Provider Differences:
1. Medical Licensing and Training
- Licensed providers: Doctors (SIP), registered nurses (STR), under physician supervision
- Unlicensed providers: Beauty therapists, wellness coaches, or minimally trained staff
- Specialized training: IV certification, phlebotomy skills, emergency response (BLS/ACLS)
2. Sterile Technique Adherence
- Proper hand hygiene protocols
- Skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine-alcohol
- Single-use disposable equipment only
- Aseptic non-touch technique (ANTT)
- CDC guideline compliance[37]
3. Emergency Preparedness
- Epinephrine available for allergic reactions
- Oxygen equipment on hand
- BLS/ACLS certified staff
- Hospital referral network established
- Emergency protocols documented and practiced
4. Ingredient Quality and Sourcing
- Regulated medications: BPOM-approved pharmaceutical-grade ingredients
- Unregulated compounds: Unknown sourcing, purity not verified
- Transparency: Clear disclosure of all ingredients and concentrations
5. Patient Assessment Process
- Comprehensive assessment: Medical history, allergies, medications, vital signs
- Minimal assessment: No health screening, immediate treatment
- Contraindication screening: Identifying patients who shouldn't receive treatment
6. Pricing Transparency
- Transparent pricing: All costs disclosed upfront, no hidden fees
- Hidden fees: Base price advertised, surcharges added at service
- Realistic claims: Evidence-based benefit descriptions
Red Flags to Avoid:
- Unwillingness to show medical licenses or credentials
- No health assessment before treatment
- Vague ingredient descriptions or refusal to disclose contents
- Unrealistic cure-all promises
- Pressure tactics or urgency without medical justification
- No emergency equipment or protocols
- Significantly below-market pricing (may indicate quality compromise)
The Bottom Line:
Provider quality directly impacts safety and efficacy. Don't choose based solely on price or convenience. Verify credentials, ask about protocols, and ensure proper medical oversight. A low price means nothing if you experience complications from poor technique or unqualified practitioners.
What IS Actually True About IV Therapy
After debunking myths, let's examine what IV therapy legitimately offers based on scientific evidence.
Evidence-Based Benefits:
1. Rapid Rehydration
IV rehydration is unquestionably superior to oral intake when you're dehydrated and nauseated. One liter of IV saline provides hydration in 20-25 minutes that might take 4-6 hours orally[38]. This is particularly valuable for:
- Bali Belly or traveler's diarrhea with vomiting
- Severe hangovers preventing oral intake
- Heat exhaustion in tropical climates
- Recovery from illness with persistent nausea
2. Correcting Documented Deficiencies
When you have a confirmed vitamin deficiency (via blood testing), IV administration can rapidly correct levels, particularly important when deficiency causes acute symptoms[39]. For example:
- B12 deficiency with neurological symptoms
- Severe magnesium deficiency causing muscle spasms
- Malabsorption disorders preventing oral nutrient uptake
3. Delivering Medications When Oral Route Unavailable
IV therapy excels at delivering anti-nausea medications, pain relief, and antibiotics when you cannot keep oral medications down[40]. This represents appropriate medical use, not wellness marketing.
4. Supporting Athletic Recovery
Limited research suggests IV hydration and electrolyte replacement may accelerate recovery in athletes after extreme exertion, though this remains controversial and not clearly superior to optimized oral strategies[41]. The benefit is most clear when athletes are severely dehydrated and unable to consume adequate fluids orally.
5. Convenience in Specific Situations
While not a medical benefit, convenience is real: receiving treatment in your hotel room while resting is genuinely more comfortable than traveling to a clinic when you feel terrible. This doesn't make IV therapy medically superior, but it's a legitimate practical advantage for travelers.
Appropriate Use Cases:
- Acute dehydration: From illness, heat, or alcohol
- Severe nausea/vomiting: Preventing oral intake
- Traveler's illness: Bali Belly requiring rapid rehydration
- Documented deficiency: Confirmed by medical testing
- Malabsorption disorders: Medical conditions impairing nutrient absorption
- Acute symptom relief: When faster recovery has genuine value (limited vacation time)
Inappropriate Use Cases:
- Routine daily supplementation (oral vitamins are sufficient)
- "Detoxing" from unspecified toxins
- Preventing hangovers (drink less alcohol instead)
- General wellness in absence of deficiency
- Replacing healthy diet with IV nutrients
The Bottom Line:
IV therapy is a legitimate medical tool for specific situations, particularly acute dehydration and situations preventing oral intake. It's not a magical cure-all or a replacement for healthy lifestyle habits. Use it as supportive medical care for appropriate indications, not as a wellness panacea.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is IV therapy always better than taking oral vitamins?
No. IV therapy offers 100% bioavailability versus 20-50% for oral supplements, but this doesn't mean it's always necessary or superior. For routine daily supplementation in healthy individuals, oral vitamins are sufficient, cost-effective, and convenient. IV therapy is most beneficial for acute situations like dehydration, malabsorption disorders, severe deficiency requiring rapid correction, or when oral intake is impossible due to nausea or vomiting.
Can IV therapy detox my body from toxins?
The detox claim is misleading. Your liver and kidneys already perform detoxification continuously and effectively. IV therapy cannot enhance this process or remove unspecified "toxins." However, IV hydration can support normal kidney function, and specific nutrients like glutathione may support liver health. The benefit is supporting existing detoxification systems, not removing mysterious toxins.
Will IV therapy instantly cure my hangover?
Not instantly, but it can significantly accelerate recovery. Hangover IV therapy provides rapid rehydration, electrolyte replacement, anti-nausea medication, and B-vitamins. Research shows IV rehydration is more effective than oral intake when dehydrated. Most patients report 50-70% symptom improvement within 20 minutes, with full recovery by 2-4 hours. It's not magic, but medically sound supportive care.
Is more vitamins always better with IV therapy?
Absolutely not. More is not better with vitamins. Water-soluble vitamins (B, C) are excreted when exceeding needs, making megadoses wasteful and sometimes harmful. Fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, K) accumulate and can cause toxicity. High-dose vitamin C can cause kidney stones in susceptible individuals. Vitamin B6 in excess causes nerve damage. Evidence-based IV therapy uses therapeutic doses based on individual needs, not maximum amounts.
Is IV therapy completely risk-free?
No medical procedure is completely risk-free. IV therapy is generally very safe when administered by qualified professionals, but potential risks include bruising (5-10% of patients), phlebitis or vein inflammation (1-5%), infiltration where fluid leaks into tissue (1-5%), allergic reactions (rare), infection if sterile protocols not followed (very rare), and fluid overload in patients with heart or kidney conditions. Proper screening, sterile technique, and monitoring minimize these risks significantly.
Should I trust IV therapy just because celebrities use it?
Celebrity endorsements are not evidence of medical efficacy. Many celebrities promote IV therapy as part of paid partnerships or personal beliefs without scientific backing. The effectiveness of IV therapy should be evaluated based on peer-reviewed research, clinical studies, and recommendation from qualified medical professionals, not social media influencers or celebrity testimonials.
Are all IV therapy providers the same?
Absolutely not. Provider qualifications vary dramatically. Key differences include medical licensing (doctors, nurses vs. unlicensed practitioners), sterile technique adherence, emergency preparedness, ingredient quality and sourcing, transparent pricing, and proper patient assessment. Always verify that providers have valid medical licenses, use BPOM-approved medications, follow sterile protocols, conduct health assessments, and have emergency medications available.
What benefits of IV therapy are actually supported by evidence?
Evidence supports IV therapy for: rapid rehydration when oral intake is insufficient (dehydration, vomiting), correcting documented vitamin deficiencies (malabsorption disorders, severe deficiency), delivering medications when oral route is unavailable, providing supportive care for hangovers and food poisoning, replacing electrolytes lost through illness, and supporting athletic recovery when combined with proper nutrition and rest. The key is appropriate use for legitimate medical needs, not cure-all claims.
Scientific References
[1] Global Wellness Institute. (2022). "Global Wellness Economy Monitor 2022." globalwellnessinstitute.org
[2] Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). "On the psychology of prediction." Psychological Review, 80(4), 237-251.
[3] Finniss, D. G., et al. (2010). "Biological, clinical, and ethical advances of placebo effects." The Lancet, 375(9715), 686-695. PubMed
[4] Yetley, E. A. (2007). "Multivitamin and multimineral dietary supplements: definitions, characterization, bioavailability, and drug interactions." American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 85(1), 269S-276S. PubMed
[5] Padayatty, S. J., et al. (2004). "Vitamin C pharmacokinetics: implications for oral and intravenous use." Annals of Internal Medicine, 140(7), 533-537. PubMed
[6] National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements. (2023). "Vitamin and Mineral Supplement Fact Sheets." ods.od.nih.gov
[7] World Health Organization. (2005). "The treatment of diarrhoea: a manual for physicians and other senior health workers." WHO
[8] Hvas, C. L., et al. (2021). "Vitamin B12 treatment for malabsorption." Nutrients, 13(4), 1-15. PubMed
[9] Green, R., et al. (2017). "Vitamin B12 deficiency." Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 3, 17040. PubMed
[10] Hodges, R. E., & Minich, D. M. (2015). "Modulation of metabolic detoxification pathways using foods and food-derived components." Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism, 2015, 760689. PubMed
[11] Klein, A. V., & Kiat, H. (2015). "Detox diets for toxin elimination and weight management: a critical review of the evidence." Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 28(6), 675-686. PubMed
[12] British Dietetic Association. (2020). "Food Facts: Detox Diets." BDA
[13] Liska, D. J. (1998). "The detoxification enzyme systems." Alternative Medicine Review, 3(3), 187-198. PubMed
[14] Forman, H. J., et al. (2009). "Glutathione: overview of its protective roles, measurement, and biosynthesis." Molecular Aspects of Medicine, 30(1-2), 1-12. PubMed
[15] Sechi, G., et al. (1996). "Reduced intravenous glutathione in the treatment of early Parkinson's disease." Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 20(7), 1159-1170. PubMed
[16] Swift, R., & Davidson, D. (1998). "Alcohol hangover: mechanisms and mediators." Alcohol Health and Research World, 22(1), 54-60. PubMed
[17] Verster, J. C., et al. (2019). "The alcohol hangover research group consensus statement on best practice in alcohol hangover research." Current Drug Abuse Reviews, 12(2), 116-126. PubMed
[18] Spandorfer, P. R., et al. (2005). "Oral versus intravenous rehydration of moderately dehydrated children." Pediatrics, 115(2), 295-301. PubMed
[19] Carlisle, J., & Stevenson, C. A. (2006). "Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting." Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3), CD004125. PubMed
[20] Thomson, A. D., et al. (2002). "The evolution and treatment of Korsakoff's syndrome." Neuropsychology Review, 12(1), 1-16. PubMed
[21] Institute of Medicine. (1998). "Dietary Reference Intakes for Thiamin, Riboflavin, Niacin, Vitamin B6, Folate, Vitamin B12, Pantothenic Acid, Biotin, and Choline." National Academies Press.
[22] Ferraro, P. M., et al. (2016). "Total, dietary, and supplemental vitamin C intake and risk of incident kidney stones." American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 67(3), 400-407. PubMed
[23] Schaumburg, H., et al. (1983). "Sensory neuropathy from pyridoxine abuse." New England Journal of Medicine, 309(8), 445-448. PubMed
[24] Guyton, J. R., & Bays, H. E. (2007). "Safety considerations with niacin therapy." American Journal of Cardiology, 99(6A), 22C-31C. PubMed
[25] Penniston, K. L., & Tanumihardjo, S. A. (2006). "The acute and chronic toxic effects of vitamin A." American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 83(2), 191-201. PubMed
[26] Miller, E. R., et al. (2005). "Meta-analysis: high-dosage vitamin E supplementation may increase all-cause mortality." Annals of Internal Medicine, 142(1), 37-46. PubMed
[27] Gaby, A. R. (2002). "Intravenous nutrient therapy: the 'Myers' Cocktail.'" Alternative Medicine Review, 7(5), 389-403. PubMed
[28] Infusion Nurses Society. (2021). "Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice." Journal of Infusion Nursing, 44(1S), S1-S224. PubMed
[29] Webster, J., et al. (2015). "Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters." Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (8), CD007798. PubMed
[30] Hadaway, L. (2007). "Infiltration and extravasation." American Journal of Nursing, 107(8), 64-72. PubMed
[31] Mermel, L. A., et al. (2009). "Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection." Clinical Infectious Diseases, 49(1), 1-45. PubMed
[32] Simons, F. E. R., et al. (2015). "World Allergy Organization Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Anaphylaxis." World Allergy Organization Journal, 8(1), 32. PubMed
[33] Perner, A., et al. (2017). "Fluid management in acute kidney injury." Intensive Care Medicine, 43(6), 807-815. PubMed
[34] McCarthy, C. J., et al. (2017). "Air embolism: diagnosis, clinical management and outcomes." Diagnostics, 7(1), 5. PubMed
[35] Federal Trade Commission. (2017). "The FTC's Endorsement Guides: What People Are Asking." FTC
[36] Sackett, D. L., et al. (1996). "Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't." BMJ, 312(7023), 71-72. PubMed
[37] O'Grady, N. P., et al. (2011). "Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections." CDC/HICPAC Guidelines. CDC
[38] Hartling, L., et al. (2006). "Oral versus intravenous rehydration for treating dehydration due to gastroenteritis in children." Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3), CD004390. PubMed
[39] Stabler, S. P. (2013). "Clinical practice: Vitamin B12 deficiency." New England Journal of Medicine, 368(2), 149-160. PubMed
[40] Weinstein, S. M., & Hagle, M. E. (2014). "Plumer's Principles and Practice of Infusion Therapy." Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 9th edition.
[41] Casa, D. J., et al. (2000). "National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement: fluid replacement for athletes." Journal of Athletic Training, 35(2), 212-224. PubMed
Related Articles
IV Therapy Safety Guide
Comprehensive guide to certifications, protocols, and best practices.
IV Therapy vs Oral Vitamins
Evidence-based comparison of absorption, efficacy, and cost.
First-Time IV Therapy Guide
What to expect, how to prepare, and common questions answered.
Medical Disclaimer
This article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. The information provided is based on published medical research and clinical guidelines but should not replace consultation with qualified healthcare professionals. IV therapy should only be administered by licensed medical professionals after proper patient assessment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition or treatment.